Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward

Alexandra Witt, Wataru Toyokawa, Kevin N Lala, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Charley M Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There has been much progress in understanding human social learning, including recent studies integrating social information into the reinforcement learning framework. Yet previous studies often assume identical payoffs between observer and demonstrator, overlooking the diversity of social information in real-world interactions. We address this gap by introducing a socially correlated bandit task that accommodates payoff differences among participants, allowing for the study of social learning under more realistic conditions. Our Social Generalization (SG) model, tested through evolutionary simulations and two online experiments, outperforms existing models by incorporating social information into the generalization process, but treating it as noisier than individual observations. Our findings suggest that human social learning is more flexible than previously believed, with the SG model indicating a potential resource-rational trade-off where social learning partially replaces individual exploration. This research highlights the flexibility of humans' social learning, allowing us to integrate social information from others with different preferences, skills, or goals.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2404928121
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume121
Issue number39
Early online date20 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • Reward
  • Female
  • Social learning - physiology
  • Humans
  • Social learning
  • Evolutionary simulations
  • Generalization
  • Exploration
  • Young adult
  • Adult
  • Social behavior
  • Computational modeling
  • Individuality
  • Male

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this