Abstract
We tested 6 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 3 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the reversed reward contingency task. Individuals were presented with pairs of quantities ranging between 0 and 6 food items. Prior to testing, some experienced apes had solved this task using 2 quantities while others were totally naive. Experienced apes transferred their ability to multiple-novel pairs after 6 to 19 months had elapsed since their initial testing. Two out of 6 naive apes (1 chimpanzee, 1 bonobo) solved the task-a proportion comparable to that of a previous study using 2 pairs of quantities. Their acquisition speed was also comparable to the successful subjects from that study. The ratio between quantities explained a large portion of the variance but affected naive and experienced individuals differently. For smaller ratios, naive individuals were well below 50% correct and experienced ones were well above 50%, yet both groups tended to converge toward 50% for larger ratios. Thus, some apes require no procedural modifications to overcome their strong bias for selecting the larger of 2 quantities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 204-212 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Comparative Psychology |
Volume | 122 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2008 |
Keywords
- inhibition
- perseveration
- quantity discrimination
- relative numerousness
- reversal learning
- SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATIONS
- INHIBITORY CONTROL
- SELF-CONTROL
- FOOD
- RESPONSES
- CHOICE
- JUDGMENTS
- SELECTION
- LARGER
- ANALOG