How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: The effects of food quantity and food visibility

PHJM Vlamings*, J Uher, J Call

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

S. T. Boysen and G. G. Berntson (1995) found that chimpanzees performed poorly on a reversed contingency task in which they had to point to the smaller of 2 food quantities to acquire the larger quantity. The authors compared the performance of 4 great ape species (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) on the reversed contingency task while manipulating food quantity (0-4 or 1-4) and food visibility (visible pairs or covered pairs). Results showed no systematic species differences but large individual differences. Some individuals of each species were able to solve the reversed contingency task. Both quantity and visibility of the food items had a significant effect on performance. Subjects performed better when the disparity between quantities was smaller and the quantities were not directly visible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-70
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Keywords

  • inhibition
  • perseveration
  • problem solving
  • SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATIONS
  • INHIBITORY CONTROL
  • LEARNING PROCESSES
  • CHIMPANZEES
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • RESPONSES
  • SELECTION
  • OEDIPUS
  • BIAS
  • REWARDS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: The effects of food quantity and food visibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this