How is the benefit of mixed social networks altered by neighbourhood deprivation for ethnic groups?

Simon Peters, Nissa Finney, Dharmi Kapadia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous research has shown that people who are in poverty live in deprived neighbourhoods. Ethnic minority groups are more likely than the White majority to be poor and live in such areas. The likelihood of being poor may be reduced by having access to mixed social networks. But, for those living in deprived neighbourhoods there may be neither opportunities nor resources to form and maintain social networks that are mixed in terms of their ethnic or geographic composition. This paper tests this contention, for ethnic groups in the UK. Specifically, we use the UK's largest household survey to examine the relationship between deprivation and mixing by investigating the following research questions: (1) Does neighbourhood deprivation alter the influence of mixed social network on poverty status? and (2) Is the influence of neighbourhood deprivation and social networks on poverty status equivalent for all ethnic minority groups? Our results suggest that high neighbourhood deprivation tends to over-ride the positive associations of geographically mixed social networks. Moreover, while this result is strong for the White British majority, there is only weak evidence that it holds for ethnic minority groups. This may imply that resource constraints restrict social network benefits, particularly for ethnic minorities.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
VolumeLatest Articles
Early online date18 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Mixed social network
  • Ethnic group
  • Poverty status
  • Neighbourhood deprivation
  • Understanding society

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How is the benefit of mixed social networks altered by neighbourhood deprivation for ethnic groups?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this