How good is the science that informs government policy? A lesson from the U.K.’s response to 2020 CoV-2 outbreak

Jessica Cooper, Neofytos Dimitriou, Oggie Arandelovic*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In an era when public faith in politicians is dwindling, yet trust in scientists remains relatively high, governments are increasingly emphasizing the role of science based policy-making in response to challenges such as climate change and global pandemics. In this paper we question the quality of some scientific advice given to governments and the robustness and transparency of the entire framework which envelopes such advice, all of which raise serious ethical concerns. In particular we focus on the so-called Imperial Model which heavily influenced the government of the United Kingdom in devising its response to the COVID-19 crisis. We focus on and highlight several fundamental methodological flaws of the model, raise concerns as to the robustness of the system which permitted these to remain unchallenged, and discuss the relevant ethical consequences.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Bioethical Inquiry
VolumeOnline First
Early online date14 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Covid-19
  • Epidemic
  • Methodology
  • Modelling
  • Decision-making
  • Public policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How good is the science that informs government policy? A lesson from the U.K.’s response to 2020 CoV-2 outbreak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this