Abstract
The principle of Universal Instantiation plays a pivotal role both in the derivation of intensional paradoxes such as Prior's paradox or Kaplan's paradox and the debate between necessitism and contingentism. We outline a distinctively free-logical approach to the intensional paradoxes and note how the free-logical outlook allows one to distinguish two different, though allied themes in higher-order necessitism. We examine the costs of this solution and compare it with the more familiar ramificationist approaches to higher-order logic. Our assessment of both approaches is largely pessimistic, and we remain reluctantly inclined to take Prior's and Kaplan's derivation at face value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Williamson on Modality |
| Editors | Juhani Yli-Vakkuri, Mark McCullagh |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon |
| Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis Group |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781315184074 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138739499, 9780367229887 |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Jul 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Higher-order free logic and the Prior-Kaplan paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver