TY - JOUR
T1 - Health, education, and social care provision after diagnosis of childhood visual disability
AU - British Childhood Visual Impairment and Blindness Study Interest Group
AU - Solebo, Ameenat Lola
AU - Teoh, Lucinda Jade
AU - Sargent, Jenefer
AU - Rahi, Jugnoo Sangeeta
AU - Abbott, Joe
AU - Abdullah, Wajda
AU - Adam, Gill
AU - Allen, Louise
AU - Anderson, Christopher
AU - Ansell, Karen
AU - Ash, Isabel
AU - Ashworth, Jane
AU - Aslam, Sher
AU - Astagi, Majunath
AU - Ball, Colin
AU - Balu, Rajesh
AU - Barrett, Victoria
AU - Bassi, Zahabiyah
AU - Bates, Adam
AU - Batra, Dushyant
AU - Bell, Sarah
AU - Belmour, Linda
AU - Benzimra, James
AU - Birrell, Ginny
AU - Biswas, Susmito
AU - Blaikie, Andrew
AU - Blundell, Michael
AU - Frieteaux, Les
AU - Bos, Ewoud
AU - Bowen, Pamela
AU - Bowman, Richard
AU - Boyle, Natalie
AU - Bradbury, John
AU - Bredow, Maria
AU - Bregu, Marsel
AU - Brennan, Rosie
AU - Brittain, Paul
AU - Buchanan, Charles
AU - Bunce, Catey
AU - Burgess, Priscilla
AU - Burke, Cathie
AU - Evans, Anthony
AU - Johnston, Ian
AU - Jones, David
AU - Kelly, Anne
AU - Morgan, Nicola
AU - Taylor, Robert
AU - Walker, David
AU - Walker, Simon
AU - Wright, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Aim: To investigate the health, education, and social care provision for children newly diagnosed with visual disability. Method: This was a national prospective study, the British Childhood Visual Impairment and Blindness Study 2 (BCVIS2), ascertaining new diagnoses of visual impairment or severe visual impairment and blindness (SVIBL), or equivalent vision. Data collection was performed by managing clinicians up to 1-year follow-up, and included health and developmental needs, and health, education, and social care provision. Results: BCVIS2 identified 784 children newly diagnosed with visual impairment/SVIBL (313 with visual impairment, 471 with SVIBL). Most children had associated systemic disorders (559 [71%], 167 [54%] with visual impairment, and 392 [84%] with SVIBL). Care from multidisciplinary teams was provided for 549 children (70%). Two-thirds (515) had not received an Education, Health, and Care Plan (EHCP). Fewer children with visual impairment had seen a specialist teacher (SVIBL 35%, visual impairment 28%, χ2 p < 0.001), or had an EHCP (11% vs 7%, χ2 p < 0.01). Interpretation: Families need additional support from managing clinicians to access recommended complex interventions such as the use of multidisciplinary teams and educational support. This need is pressing, as the population of children with visual impairment/SVIBL is expected to grow in size and complexity. What this paper adds: One year after visual disability diagnosis, one in three children had not received the recommended care from a multidisciplinary team. Two-thirds had not yet received the recommended Education, Health, and Care Plan. There is an under-provision of recommended care, despite significant and complex need.
AB - Aim: To investigate the health, education, and social care provision for children newly diagnosed with visual disability. Method: This was a national prospective study, the British Childhood Visual Impairment and Blindness Study 2 (BCVIS2), ascertaining new diagnoses of visual impairment or severe visual impairment and blindness (SVIBL), or equivalent vision. Data collection was performed by managing clinicians up to 1-year follow-up, and included health and developmental needs, and health, education, and social care provision. Results: BCVIS2 identified 784 children newly diagnosed with visual impairment/SVIBL (313 with visual impairment, 471 with SVIBL). Most children had associated systemic disorders (559 [71%], 167 [54%] with visual impairment, and 392 [84%] with SVIBL). Care from multidisciplinary teams was provided for 549 children (70%). Two-thirds (515) had not received an Education, Health, and Care Plan (EHCP). Fewer children with visual impairment had seen a specialist teacher (SVIBL 35%, visual impairment 28%, χ2 p < 0.001), or had an EHCP (11% vs 7%, χ2 p < 0.01). Interpretation: Families need additional support from managing clinicians to access recommended complex interventions such as the use of multidisciplinary teams and educational support. This need is pressing, as the population of children with visual impairment/SVIBL is expected to grow in size and complexity. What this paper adds: One year after visual disability diagnosis, one in three children had not received the recommended care from a multidisciplinary team. Two-thirds had not yet received the recommended Education, Health, and Care Plan. There is an under-provision of recommended care, despite significant and complex need.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143288076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dmcn.15447
DO - 10.1111/dmcn.15447
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143288076
SN - 0012-1622
VL - 65
SP - 803
EP - 810
JO - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
JF - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
IS - 6
ER -