Abstract
The expectation part of a linear model is often presented as a single
equation with unknown parameters, and the reader is supposed to know
that this is shorthand for a whole family of expectation models (for
example, is there interaction or not?). It is helpful to list the whole
family of models separately and then represent them on a Hasse diagram.
This shows which models are sub-models of others, which helps the user
to respect marginality when choosing the most parsimonious model to
explain the data. Each row in an analysis-of-variance table corresponds
to an edge in the Hasse diagram. In the scaled version of the Hasse
diagram, the length of each edge is proportional to the appropriate mean
square. This gives a visual display of the analysis of variance
(ANOVA). For some people, this is easier to interpret than the standard
analysis-of-variance table. Moreover, the scaled Hasse diagram makes
clear the difficulties in model choice that can occur under
non-orthogonality. The ideas are illustrated using some familiar
families of models defined by crossed and nested factors, possibly
including polynomial terms for quantitative factors, as well as some
more recently introduced families of models for experiments in
biodiversity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5034-5067 |
Journal | Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 21 |
Early online date | 15 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- Analysis of variance
- Hasse diagram
- Linear model
- Marginality
- Mean square
- Scaled Hasse diagram