TY - JOUR
T1 - Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task
AU - Buttelmann, David
AU - Buttelmann, Frances
AU - Carpenter, Malinda
AU - Call, Josep
AU - Tomasello, Michael
PY - 2017/4/5
Y1 - 2017/4/5
N2 - Understanding the behavior of others in a wide variety of circumstances requires an understanding of their psychological states. Humans’ nearest primate relatives, the great apes, understand many psychological states of others, for example, perceptions, goals, and desires. However, so far there is little evidence that they possess the key marker of advanced human social cognition: an understanding of false beliefs. Here we demonstrate that in a nonverbal (implicit) false-belief test which is passed by human 1-year-old infants, great apes as a group, including chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and orangutans (Pongo abelii), distinguish between true and false beliefs in their helping behavior. Great apes thus may possess at least some basic understanding that an agent’s actions are based on her beliefs about reality. Hence, such understanding might not be the exclusive province of the human species.
AB - Understanding the behavior of others in a wide variety of circumstances requires an understanding of their psychological states. Humans’ nearest primate relatives, the great apes, understand many psychological states of others, for example, perceptions, goals, and desires. However, so far there is little evidence that they possess the key marker of advanced human social cognition: an understanding of false beliefs. Here we demonstrate that in a nonverbal (implicit) false-belief test which is passed by human 1-year-old infants, great apes as a group, including chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and orangutans (Pongo abelii), distinguish between true and false beliefs in their helping behavior. Great apes thus may possess at least some basic understanding that an agent’s actions are based on her beliefs about reality. Hence, such understanding might not be the exclusive province of the human species.
UR - http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173793#sec016
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173793
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173793
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 4
M1 - e0173793
ER -