Abstract
Since the 1970’s there has been a major increase in adventure sports participation but it seems that engagement in such sports comes with a stigma: adventure sports participants are often regarded as reckless ‘daredevils’. We approach the questions about people’s perception of risk and recklessness in adventure sports by combining empirical research with philosophical analysis. First, we provide empirical evidence that suggests that laypeople tend to assess the danger of adventure sports as greater than more mundane sports and judge adventure sports participants as more reckless than participants in non-adventure sports. We contextualise these findings within existing psychological risk perception paradigms and outline new philosophical explanations of the identified pattern in laypeople’s risk perception.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-284 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of the Philosophy of Sport |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 7 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Risk perception
- Recklessness
- Adventure sports
- Concepts of risk