Gratuitous risk: danger and recklessness perception of adventure sports participants

Philip A. Ebert*, Ian Durbach, Claire Field

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since the 1970’s there has been a major increase in adventure sports participation but it seems that engagement in such sports comes with a stigma: adventure sports participants are often regarded as reckless ‘daredevils’. We approach the questions about people’s perception of risk and recklessness in adventure sports by combining empirical research with philosophical analysis. First, we provide empirical evidence that suggests that laypeople tend to assess the danger of adventure sports as greater than more mundane sports and judge adventure sports participants as more reckless than participants in non-adventure sports. We contextualise these findings within existing psychological risk perception paradigms and outline new philosophical explanations of the identified pattern in laypeople’s risk perception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-284
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of Sport
Volume51
Issue number2
Early online date7 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Risk perception
  • Recklessness
  • Adventure sports
  • Concepts of risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gratuitous risk: danger and recklessness perception of adventure sports participants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this