Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential

Rachel Pain , Mike Kesby, Kye Askins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    173 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we offer a critique and an alternative to current proposals to include the economic and social impacts of research in the next UK audit of academic research. In contrast to most responses from UK academics, our argument is for impact; while the growing marketisation of knowledge is to be deplored, resources and activities within universities do have a vital role to play in progressive social change. The problem is that the current proposals will produce and retrench an elite model of power/knowledge relationships. We propose an understanding of impact based on the co-production of knowledge between universities and communities, modelled in research practice in participatory geographies. This is more likely to result in more equitable and radically transformative impacts of knowledge, making us socially accountable rather than driven by economic accountancy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)183-188
    Number of pages7
    JournalArea
    Volume43
    Issue number2
    Early online date11 Nov 2010
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • impact
    • audit
    • participatory geographies
    • power
    • knowledge
    • UK

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this