Geographical variation in abundance of striped and common dolphins of the western Mediterranean

Jaume Forcada*, Philip Hammond

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Line-transect data from sighting surveys conducted in the western Mediterranean (in 1991) and the Alboran Sea (in 1992) were analysed to estimate densities and numbers of striped and common dolphins in various areas of the western Mediterranean. Density of striped dolphins in the northwestern Mediterranean was estimated as 0.20 dolphins km-2 (CV = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.12 and 0.32) and was 41% higher than in the southwestern Mediterranean, where it was estimated as 0.12 dolphins km-2 (CV = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.05 and 0.25). The highest densities were observed in the Liguro-Provencal basin, with 0.24 dolphins km-2 (CV = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14 and 0.40), and the Alboran Sea, with 0.20 dolphins km-2 (CV = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.10 and 0.36). These areas, and especially the Ligurian Sea, appear to be the most productive in terms of the food consumed by striped dolphins. Common dolphins were abundant only in the Alboran Sea with an estimated density of 0.16 dolphins km-2 (CV = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.08 and 0.35), scarce in the south Batearic area and almost absent in the northwestern Mediterranean. The magnitude of the dolphin by-catch in fishing operations in the Alboran Sea and other areas stresses the need for further assessment of densities and numbers, notably in the Alboran Sea and the North African Mediterranean waters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-325
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Sea Research
Volume39
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 1998

Keywords

  • Abundance
  • Common dolphins
  • Delphinus delphis
  • Density
  • Stenella coeruleoalba
  • Striped dolphins
  • Western Mediterranean

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographical variation in abundance of striped and common dolphins of the western Mediterranean'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this