Geographic variation in baseline innate immune function does not follow variation in aridity along a tropical environmental gradient

Chima Josiah Nwaogu, Will Cresswell, Irene Tieleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Geographic variation in aridity determines environmental productivity patterns, including large-scale variability in pathogens, vectors and associated diseases. If disease risk decreases with increasing aridity and is matched by immune defense, we predict a decrease in innate immune function along a gradient of increasing aridity from the cool-wet forest to the hot-dry Sahel, from south to north in Nigeria. We sampled blood and measured five innate immune indices from 286 Common Bulbuls Pycnonotus barbatus between 6 and 13°N. We sampled in the dry season; we resampled the first location (Jos) also as the last sample location to test temporal change in immune function. Immune indices did not decrease with aridity. One immune index, nitric oxide concentration showed a weak quadratic pattern. In Jos, ovotransferrin concentration, haemagglutination and haemolysis titres increased 12 weeks into the dry season, contrary to expectations that immune indices should decrease with increased dryness. In this tropical system, innate immune function does not decrease with increasing aridity but temporal factors within a location may influence immune function more strongly than spatial variation in aridity, suggesting that immune variation does not follow a simple environmental productivity pattern. Consequently, caution should probably be exercised in predicting effects of climate variability on immune function or disease risk.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5909
Number of pages13
JournalScientific Reports
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographic variation in baseline innate immune function does not follow variation in aridity along a tropical environmental gradient'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this