Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods

Emma L. Carroll, Michael Bruford, J. A. DeWoody, G Leroy, A Strand, L Waits, J Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

125 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD-seq) require large amounts of high quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biology: genetic monitoring using minimally invasive sampling (MIS) methods. Without handling or even observing an animal, MIS methods (e.g. collection of hair, skin, faeces) can provide genetic information on individuals or populations. Such samples typically yield low quality and/or quantities of DNA, restricting the type of molecular methods that can be used. Despite this limitation, genetic monitoring using MIS is an effective tool for estimating population demographic parameters and monitoring genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic monitoring is likely to become more important in the future as many natural populations are undergoing anthropogenically-driven declines, which are unlikely to abate without intensive adaptive management efforts that often include MIS approaches. Here we profile the expanding suite of genomic methods and platforms compatible with producing genotypes from MIS, considering factors such as development costs and error rates. We evaluate how powerful new approaches will enhance our ability to investigate questions typically answered using genetic monitoring, such as estimating abundance, genetic structure and relatedness. As the field is in a period of unusually rapid transition, we also highlight the importance of legacy datasets and recommend how to address the challenges of moving between traditional and next generation genetic monitoring platforms. Finally, we consider how genetic monitoring could move beyond genotypes in the future. For example, assessing microbiomes or epigenetic markers could provide a greater understanding of the relationship between individuals and their environment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1094-1119
Number of pages26
JournalEvolutionary Applications
Volume11
Issue number7
Early online date24 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Wildlife management
  • Wildlife forensics
  • Population demography
  • Conservation genetics
  • DNA fingerprinting
  • Individual identification
  • Non-invasive genetic sampling
  • Next-gen genetic monitoring with MIS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this