Abstract
The tragic events of 9/11 were experienced as an overwhelming individual trauma for those closest to the attacks and as a disorienting collective trauma for the nation as a whole. One immediate and protracted response has been an increase in moralizing in the United States. To provide a context for the increased moralizing post-9/11, we present a model of moral motives based on differences in regulatory focus, and four distinct moral orientations are distinguished: Self-Restraint, Self-Reliance, Social Order, and Social Justice. We propose that the type of moralizing that increased post-9/11 reflects a particular moral motive--Social Order--that is activated by protection and security needs and emphasizes social control and restrictions. Consistent with recent work on moral motives, this reaction can be understood as a motivated response to Americans' newfound sense of threat and insecurity in the aftermath of 9/11.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 325-332 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Basic and Applied Social Psychology |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2006 |
Keywords
- collective trauma
- moralizing
- moral motives
- self-restraint
- self-reliance
- social order
- social justic
- terror attacks
- 9/11