TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexibility in wild infant chimpanzee vocal behavior
AU - Dezecache, Guillaume
AU - Zuberbühler, Klaus
AU - Davila-Ross, Marina
AU - Dahl, Christoph D
N1 - The research was supported by a Fyssen Fellowship, British Academy Newton International Fellowship (NF171514), and CAP2025 funding awarded to G.D., funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration (Grant agreement no. 283871) awarded to KZ the Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P3_154741) awarded to C.D.D., the Startup-funding of Taipei Medical University (108-6402-004-112) awarded to C.D.D., and (310030_185324) awarded to KZ
PY - 2020/12/2
Y1 - 2020/12/2
N2 - How did human language
evolve from earlier forms of communication? One way to address this
question is to compare prelinguistic human vocal behavior with nonhuman
primate calls. An important finding has been that, prior to speech and
from early on, human infant vocal behavior exhibits functional
flexibility, or the capacity to produce sounds that are not tied to one
specific function. This is reflected in human infants’ use of single
categories of protophones (precursors of speech sounds) in various
affective circumstances, such that a given call type can occur in and
express positive, neutral, or negative affective states, depending on
the occasion. Nonhuman primate vocal behavior, in contrast, is seen as
comparably inflexible, with different call types tied to specific
functions and sometimes to specific affective states (e.g. screams
mostly occur in negative circumstances). As a first step toward
addressing this claim, we examined the vocal behavior of six wild infant
chimpanzees during their first year of life. We found that the most
common vocal signal, grunts, occurred in a range of contexts that were
deemed positive, neutral, and negative. Using automated feature
extraction and supervised learning algorithms, we also found acoustic
variants of grunts produced in the affective contexts, suggesting
gradation within this vocal category. In contrast, the second most
common call type of infant chimpanzees, the whimpers, was produced in
only one affective context, in line with standard models of nonhuman
primate vocal behavior. Insofar as our affective categorization reflects
infants’ true affective state, our results suggest that the most common
chimpanzee vocalization, the grunt is not affectively bound. Affective
decoupling is a prerequisite for chimpanzee grunts (and other vocal
categories) to be deemed ‘functionally flexible’. If later confirmed to
be a functionally flexible vocal type, this would indicate that the
evolution of this foundational vocal capability occurred before the
split between the Homo and Pan lineages.
AB - How did human language
evolve from earlier forms of communication? One way to address this
question is to compare prelinguistic human vocal behavior with nonhuman
primate calls. An important finding has been that, prior to speech and
from early on, human infant vocal behavior exhibits functional
flexibility, or the capacity to produce sounds that are not tied to one
specific function. This is reflected in human infants’ use of single
categories of protophones (precursors of speech sounds) in various
affective circumstances, such that a given call type can occur in and
express positive, neutral, or negative affective states, depending on
the occasion. Nonhuman primate vocal behavior, in contrast, is seen as
comparably inflexible, with different call types tied to specific
functions and sometimes to specific affective states (e.g. screams
mostly occur in negative circumstances). As a first step toward
addressing this claim, we examined the vocal behavior of six wild infant
chimpanzees during their first year of life. We found that the most
common vocal signal, grunts, occurred in a range of contexts that were
deemed positive, neutral, and negative. Using automated feature
extraction and supervised learning algorithms, we also found acoustic
variants of grunts produced in the affective contexts, suggesting
gradation within this vocal category. In contrast, the second most
common call type of infant chimpanzees, the whimpers, was produced in
only one affective context, in line with standard models of nonhuman
primate vocal behavior. Insofar as our affective categorization reflects
infants’ true affective state, our results suggest that the most common
chimpanzee vocalization, the grunt is not affectively bound. Affective
decoupling is a prerequisite for chimpanzee grunts (and other vocal
categories) to be deemed ‘functionally flexible’. If later confirmed to
be a functionally flexible vocal type, this would indicate that the
evolution of this foundational vocal capability occurred before the
split between the Homo and Pan lineages.
U2 - 10.1093/jole/lzaa009
DO - 10.1093/jole/lzaa009
M3 - Article
SN - 2058-4571
VL - Advance articles
JO - Journal of Language Evolution
JF - Journal of Language Evolution
M1 - lzaa009
ER -