Financial performance, costs, and active management of U.S. socially responsible investment funds

Jimmy Chen, Bert Scholtens

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Responsible investors, like regular investors, need to investigate whether to actively or passively manage their investments. This especial is of interest for responsible investing as it requires additional information generation and processing compared to more conventional investing. This study compares socially responsible investment funds in the US with a special focus on their financial performance, cost of investing, and degree of active management. We do not find persuasive evidence that actively managed socially responsible investment funds perform better than their passively managed counterparts on both an individual and aggregate basis. Only active specialist thematic socially responsible investment funds appear to generate risk-adjusted returns that overcome their expense ratios. Furthermore, we find that some active SRI funds seem to operate as ‘closet indexers’ with a low degree of active management.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of St Andrews
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameWorking Papers in Responsible Banking and Finance
PublisherUniversity of St Andrews

Keywords

  • Socially responsible investment
  • Investment funds
  • Fund performance
  • Cost of investing
  • Active versus passive
  • US

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial performance, costs, and active management of U.S. socially responsible investment funds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this