Abstract
The law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts in the twenty-first century. Both academics and practitioners have argued that today’s wars tend to be asymmetric conflicts between states and nonstate actors, whereas the law of armed conflict was made with a view to symmetrical interstate war. This article challenges that notion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 45-56 |
Journal | Parameters |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |