TY - JOUR
T1 - Fermi energy, electrical conductivity, and the energy gap of NaNbO3
AU - Bein, Nicole
AU - Kmet, Brigita
AU - Rojac, Tadej
AU - Golob, Andreja Bencan
AU - Malic, Barbara
AU - Moxter, Julian
AU - Schneider, Thorsten
AU - Fulanovic, Lovro
AU - Azadeh, Maryam
AU - Froemling, Till
AU - Egert, Sonja
AU - Wang, Hongguang
AU - van Aken, Peter
AU - Schwarzkopf, Jutta
AU - Klein, Andreas
N1 - Funding: The presented work has been supported by the state of Hesse, Germany, within the LOEWE priority project FLAME (Fermi Level Engineering of Antiferroelectric Materials for Energy Storage and High Voltage Insulation Systems), by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) through the PPP Slovenia, Project ID 57450108, by the Slovenian Research Agency (core funding P2-0105 and bilateral Project No. BI-DE/19-20-008), and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 823717-ESTEEM3.
PY - 2022/8/3
Y1 - 2022/8/3
N2 - The energy of the valence band maximum of NaNbO3 is determined from the Schottky barrier heights at the contacts with low work function Sn-doped In2O3 and high work function RuO2 by means of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with in situ interface preparation. The measurements reveal a valence-band edge energy, which is comparable to that of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3. The energy gap of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 is 3.2 eV and comparable to the values of 3.4 eV to 3.5 eV, which are determined by means of optical and electron energy loss spectroscopy for NaNbO3. It is therefore expected that the conduction band minimum of NaNbO3 is also located at a similar energy as the conduction band minimum of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3. If this is the case, it can be expected that donor doping of NaNbO3 leads to an electrical conductivity, which is comparable to those of donor-doped SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 (up to ∼ 1 S/cm−1). In contrast, Sr- and Ca-doped NaNbO3 bulk ceramics exhibit a room temperature conductivity up to 10 × 10−10 S/cm−1, only slightly higher than that of NaNbO3. High-field conductivity measurements and impedance spectroscopy give no indication that the low conductivity is caused by insulating grain boundaries separating electrically conductive grains. It is therefore suggested that the energy gap of NaNbO3 is substantially higher than the gap of 3.4 eV to 3.5 eV determined from optical spectroscopy reported in literature and from electron energy loss spectroscopy within this paper, as also suggested from electronic structure calculations of LiNbO3 [Phys. Rev. B 77, 035106 (2008)].
AB - The energy of the valence band maximum of NaNbO3 is determined from the Schottky barrier heights at the contacts with low work function Sn-doped In2O3 and high work function RuO2 by means of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with in situ interface preparation. The measurements reveal a valence-band edge energy, which is comparable to that of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3. The energy gap of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 is 3.2 eV and comparable to the values of 3.4 eV to 3.5 eV, which are determined by means of optical and electron energy loss spectroscopy for NaNbO3. It is therefore expected that the conduction band minimum of NaNbO3 is also located at a similar energy as the conduction band minimum of SrTiO3 and BaTiO3. If this is the case, it can be expected that donor doping of NaNbO3 leads to an electrical conductivity, which is comparable to those of donor-doped SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 (up to ∼ 1 S/cm−1). In contrast, Sr- and Ca-doped NaNbO3 bulk ceramics exhibit a room temperature conductivity up to 10 × 10−10 S/cm−1, only slightly higher than that of NaNbO3. High-field conductivity measurements and impedance spectroscopy give no indication that the low conductivity is caused by insulating grain boundaries separating electrically conductive grains. It is therefore suggested that the energy gap of NaNbO3 is substantially higher than the gap of 3.4 eV to 3.5 eV determined from optical spectroscopy reported in literature and from electron energy loss spectroscopy within this paper, as also suggested from electronic structure calculations of LiNbO3 [Phys. Rev. B 77, 035106 (2008)].
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137262286
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.084404
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.084404
M3 - Article
SN - 2475-9953
VL - 6
JO - Physical Review Materials
JF - Physical Review Materials
IS - 8
M1 - 084404
ER -