Fatalism and false futures in De interpretatione 9

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

In De interpretatione 9, Aristotle argues against the fatalist view that if statements about future contingent singular events (e.g. ‘There will be a sea battle tomorrow,’ ‘There will not be a sea battle tomorrow’) are already true or false, then the events to which those statements refer will necessarily occur or necessarily not occur. Scholars have generally held that, to refute this argument, Aristotle allows that future contingent statements are exempt from either the principle of bivalence, or the law of excluded middle. This paper offers a new interpretation of Aristotle’s refutation of fatalism. According to this interpretation, each member of a pair of contradictory future contingent statements, in virtue of expressing modal necessity, is simply false.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford studies in ancient philosophy
EditorsRachana Kamtekar
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter2
Pages49-88
Number of pages49
Volume63
ISBN (Electronic)9780191980657
ISBN (Print)9780192885197, 9780192885172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2024

Publication series

NameOxford studies in ancient philosophy
NumberWinter 2022
Volume63
ISSN (Print)0265-7651

Keywords

  • Fatalism
  • Necessitarianism
  • Determinism
  • Bivalence
  • Aristotle
  • De interpretatione 9
  • Sea battle
  • Future contingent
  • Tense logic
  • Modality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fatalism and false futures in De interpretatione 9'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this