Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Extreme exposure to filtered far-UVC: a case study

  • Ewan Eadie
  • , Isla M. R. Barnard
  • , Sally H. Ibbotson
  • , Kenneth Wood

Research output: Contribution to journal › Special issue › peer-review

Abstract

Far-UVC devices are being commercially sold as "safe for humans" for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, without supporting human safety data. We felt there was a need for rapid proof-of-concept human self-exposure, to inform future controlled research and promote informed discussion. A Fitzpatrick Skin Type II individual exposed their inner forearms to large radiant exposures from a filtered Krypton-Chloride (KrCl) far-UVC system (SafeZoneUVC, Ushio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with peak emission at 222 nm. No visible skin changes were observed at 1,500 mJcm-2, whereas skin yellowing that appeared immediately and resolved within 24 hours occurred with a 6,000 mJcm-2 exposure. No erythema was observed at any time point with exposures up to 18,000 mJcm-2. These results combined with Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer computer modelling suggest that filtering longer ultraviolet wavelengths is critical for the human skin safety of far-UVC devices. This work also contributes to growing arguments for the exploration of exposure limit expansion, which would subsequently enable faster inactivation of viruses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-531
JournalPhotochemistry and Photobiology
Volume97
Issue number3
Early online date3 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extreme exposure to filtered far-UVC: a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this