Extreme exposure to filtered far-UVC: a case study

Ewan Eadie, Isla M.R. Barnard, Sally H. Ibbotson, Kenneth Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Far-UVC devices are being commercially sold as "safe for humans" for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, without supporting human safety data. We felt there was a need for rapid proof-of-concept human self-exposure, to inform future controlled research and promote informed discussion. A Fitzpatrick Skin Type II individual exposed their inner forearms to large radiant exposures from a filtered Krypton-Chloride (KrCl) far-UVC system (SafeZoneUVC, Ushio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with peak emission at 222 nm. No visible skin changes were observed at 1,500 mJcm-2, whereas skin yellowing that appeared immediately and resolved within 24 hours occurred with a 6,000 mJcm-2 exposure. No erythema was observed at any time point with exposures up to 18,000 mJcm-2. These results combined with Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer computer modelling suggest that filtering longer ultraviolet wavelengths is critical for the human skin safety of far-UVC devices. This work also contributes to growing arguments for the exploration of exposure limit expansion, which would subsequently enable faster inactivation of viruses.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhotochemistry and Photobiology
VolumeEarly view
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extreme exposure to filtered far-UVC: a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this