Abstract
This article considers some neglected aspects of the early history of the Auchinleck Manuscript (Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland, MS Adv. 19. 2.1). It considers the evidence of the leaves that have been removed from the manuscript and which survive elsewhere and suggests that there were different phases to such extractions, some of which occurred while the manuscript was in the possession of a Scottish binder. The article also suggests that it is unlikely that the manuscript was bound at any early stage in its history.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 292-304 |
Journal | The Library |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2 Sept 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Keywords
- Auchinleck
- Binding
- NLS Advocates MS 19.2.1
- Manuscript
- St Andrews
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for the history of the Auchinleck Manuscript'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Margaret Connolly
- School of English - Professor of Palaeography and Codicology
- School of History - Professor of Palaeography and Codicology
- Institute of Medieval Studies - Director
Person: Academic