Abstract
From Aristophanes, who presented his contemporary Euripides as debunking established religion, and from the biographical accounts of immediately succeeding centuries, which presented him in the same light, Euripides would seem to be an anti-traditional figure. This external evidence would seem to be corroborated by much internal evidence in the plays, suggestive of a sceptical and questioning intellect, taking up the challenging ideas of such philosophers as Xenophanes and interacting with the thought of the sophistic enlightenment. Views of the gods in Ion are peculiarly polarised. It is an attack on Apollo or a vindication of Apollo. Athens and the aetiology of the Arrephoria are central or Delphi and Apollo are more significant; or Eleusis is a vital link. Apollo was a Protean deity with many titles, which varied from place to place. Of these the most prevalent in fifth century cult, on the evidence of inscriptions, was Delios, Delian.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Passionate Intellect |
| Subtitle of host publication | Essays on the Transformation of Classical Traditions presented to Professor I.G. Kidd |
| Editors | Lewis Ayres |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781003421184 |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Euripides: Ion and Phoenissae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver