Ethics and health research priority setting: a narrative review

Joseph Millum*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This narrative review aims to describe current practice and ongoing discussions in the academic literature regarding ethics and health research priority setting. It begins with some preliminary distinctions regarding types of research priority setting. It then gives some background on current practice with respect to formal research priority setting exercises, including summaries of The Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research method, the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method, the Combined Approach Matrix (CAM), the Delphi method, the Essential National Health Research (ENHR) strategy for priority setting, and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) framework. The majority of the paper reports the results of a literature review covering specifically ethical issues under the thematic headings of process criteria, substantive criteria, global justice, the obligations of specific actors, and research topics. It closes with some summary thoughts about apparent gaps and directions for future investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number203
Number of pages20
JournalWellcome Open Research
Volume9
Early online date17 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Equity
  • Research priority setting
  • Research agenda setting
  • Health policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and health research priority setting: a narrative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this