Estimating the Irish public's willingness to pay for more sustainable salmon produced by integrated multi-trophic aquaculture

Suzanne van Osch, Stephen Hynes, Tim O’Higgins, Nick Hanley, Danny Campbell, Shirra Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) has been put forward as a potential sustainable alternative to single fin fish species aquaculture. In IMTA, several species are combined in the production process. Integrating species has a conceivable dual advantage; the environmental impact can be lowered through nutrient cycling and from an economic perspective there is potential for increased efficiency, product diversification and a higher willingness to pay for more environmentally friendly produced salmon. This paper presents the results from a choice experiment which examines whether the Irish public is willing to pay a premium for “sustainably produced” farmed salmon from an IMTA process. Uniquely, an ecolabel was used in the design, based on familiar energy rating labels, to communicate the environmental pressure of fish farming to respondents. The experiment demonstrates that the Irish public has a willingness to pay a price premium for sustainability in salmon farming and for locally produced salmon.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalMarine Policy
Volume84
Early online date3 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Sustainable aquaculture
  • Choice experiments
  • Ecolabels
  • IMTA
  • Willingness to pay

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating the Irish public's willingness to pay for more sustainable salmon produced by integrated multi-trophic aquaculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this