Abstract
In the published version of this article [1] the value W was erroneously replaced with a lowercase w in footnote 2, in the sentence "This is rather standard in single-agent belief logics based on plausibility models as the possible worlds in W are taken to be epistemically possible ones which cannot be distinguished with absolute certainty", as well as in the following sentence "By a finite model «W,≥, T, ⊕, b, t, v», we mean a model in which both the set of possible worlds W and the set of possible topics T are finite" on page 800 of the article. The publisher apologizes for the error.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1088 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Review of Symbolic Logic |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 12 Nov 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: DYNAMIC HYPERINTENSIONAL BELIEF REVISION (The Review of Symbolic Logic (2020) 14:3 (766-811) DOI: 10.1017/S1755020319000686)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Dynamic hyperintensional belief revision
Özgün, A. & Berto, F., 21 Jul 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: The Review of Symbolic Logic. FirstViewResearch output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver