Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of St Andrews Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research output
Datasets/Software
Research units
Projects
Activities
Impacts
Prizes
Press/Media
Student theses
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Epistemic injustice in utterance interpretation
Andrew Peet
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemology
Philosophy
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic injustice in utterance interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Arts and Humanities
Utterance Interpretation
100%
Epistemic injustice
100%
Injustice
100%
Speaker
66%
Testimonial Injustice
50%
Harm
33%
Stereotypes
33%
Illusion
16%
Communicative Action
16%
hearer
16%
Epistemic
16%
Action
16%
Psychology
Ethics
100%