ENTITLEMENT AND EVIDENCE

Martin Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Entitlement is conceived as a kind of positive epistemic status, attaching to certain propositions, that involves no cognitive or intellectual accomplishment on the part of the beneficiarya status that is in place by default. In this paper I will argue that the notion of entitlementor something very like itfalls out of an idea that may at first blush seem rather disparate: that the evidential support relation can be understood as a kind of variably strict conditional (in the sense of Lewis 1973). Lewis provided a general recipe for deriving what he termed inner modalities from any variably strict conditional governed by a logic meeting certain constraints. On my proposal, entitlement need be nothing more exotic than the inner necessity associated with evidential support. Understanding entitlement in this way helps to answer some common concernsin particular, the concern that entitlement could only be a pragmatic, and not genuinely epistemic, status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-753
Number of pages19
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Keywords

  • entitlement
  • evidence
  • variably strict conditional
  • inner modality
  • JUSTIFICATION
  • BELIEF
  • RATIONALITY
  • LOGICS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ENTITLEMENT AND EVIDENCE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this