Entering a dialogue: positioning case study findings towards theory

Hans-Gerd Ridder, Christina Hoon, Alina McCandless Baluch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    79 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Demonstrating a theoretical contribution is seen as a central challenge in case study research; however, the literature provides little guidance on the crucial step of positioning the study's theoretical claims in relationship to prior theory. This paper addresses the question of how to enter into a dialogue with extant theory in theory building case study research in the field of management. We present three ways of positioning to demonstrate a theoretical contribution, illustrating each with examples from recent case studies drawing on the dynamic capabilities approach. By distinguishing between seeking complementarities and dissimilarities in theory building, we add to this discussion and shed light on the benefits of entering a synergistic, antagonistic and pluralistic dialogue for making a significant theoretical contribution. Methodologically, we more fully specify how case study researchers can elaborate upon their theoretical claims in relation to prior theory.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)373-387
    JournalBritish Journal of Management
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    Early online date19 Nov 2012
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Entering a dialogue: positioning case study findings towards theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this