Abstract
This paper discusses methodological dilemmas that were encountered, and strategies used to overcome them, in the Viewfinder project that was undertaken in 2004 in Sheffield, UK. The project investigated refugees' perceptions and experiences of urban public open space in the UK. Through partnership with a 12-week, accredited photography training course and visits to public open spaces, the research combined visual, experiential, participatory and longitudinal approaches. This paper discusses the success of these in relation to three aims: (1) generating a research situation of open communication; (2) collaborating with non-academic partners; and (3) creating mutual benefit. The research identifies methodological techniques that have potential for engaging marginalised groups in landscape and planning research and in consultation practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-46 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Planning Theory and Practice |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ethics
- Parks
- Participation
- Refugees
- Sheffield
- Visual
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Engaging with marginalised groups in public open space research: The potential of collaboration and combined methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver