TY - JOUR
T1 - Engaging the geopolitics of asylum seeking
T2 - the care/control nexus of vulnerability assessments in the context of the EU-Turkey Agreement
AU - Papada, Evie
PY - 2021/3/10
Y1 - 2021/3/10
N2 - This article explores vulnerability assessments as practices of
filtering, caring and border enforcement. Following the EU-Turkish
Agreement which came to force March 2016, migrants crossing from the
Turkish coast onto the Greek Aegean islands are subject to a set of
administrative procedures which assess the country responsible for
processing their asylum claim. As I demonstrate their chances of accessing the asylum
process or risk being returned to Turkey are shaped by the outcome of
vulnerability assessments. Drawing together feminist approaches on
vulnerability and geopolitics
with recent work that addresses hotspots and the humanitarian border,
the article suggest that vulnerability assessments are is crucial for
understanding the ways in which state strategies to discourage mobility
are woven into protection practices and the ways in which exclusions are
authorised through the strategic deployment of vulnerability. The study
is based on fieldwork and interviews conducted on the island of Lesbos
during three separate periods between the summer of 2017 and December
2018. By interrogating processes of documentation and the role of state
and non-state actors in the operationalising vulnerability, I
demonstrate how mobile bodies are governed through vulnerability,
medical knowledge and trauma. As a result, vulnerability assessments
privilege certain, often gendered mobilities as opposed to others while
in parallel contribute to enhancing a mode of care and control at the
border that justifies the perpetuation of forms of violence.
AB - This article explores vulnerability assessments as practices of
filtering, caring and border enforcement. Following the EU-Turkish
Agreement which came to force March 2016, migrants crossing from the
Turkish coast onto the Greek Aegean islands are subject to a set of
administrative procedures which assess the country responsible for
processing their asylum claim. As I demonstrate their chances of accessing the asylum
process or risk being returned to Turkey are shaped by the outcome of
vulnerability assessments. Drawing together feminist approaches on
vulnerability and geopolitics
with recent work that addresses hotspots and the humanitarian border,
the article suggest that vulnerability assessments are is crucial for
understanding the ways in which state strategies to discourage mobility
are woven into protection practices and the ways in which exclusions are
authorised through the strategic deployment of vulnerability. The study
is based on fieldwork and interviews conducted on the island of Lesbos
during three separate periods between the summer of 2017 and December
2018. By interrogating processes of documentation and the role of state
and non-state actors in the operationalising vulnerability, I
demonstrate how mobile bodies are governed through vulnerability,
medical knowledge and trauma. As a result, vulnerability assessments
privilege certain, often gendered mobilities as opposed to others while
in parallel contribute to enhancing a mode of care and control at the
border that justifies the perpetuation of forms of violence.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102504607
U2 - 10.1080/14650045.2021.1884548
DO - 10.1080/14650045.2021.1884548
M3 - Article
SN - 1465-0045
VL - Latest articles
JO - Geopolitics
JF - Geopolitics
ER -