Engaged onlooking: how organisational identification shapes public condoning of corporate corruption

Fergus Gilmour Neville*, S. Alexander Haslam, Maaike Homan, Stephen David Reicher, Niklas Steffens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine how social identity processes shape condoning of organisational corruption among onlookers. Two studies examined the willingness of outside observers to condone, or else condemn, corrupt actions of real organisations, a process we call “engaged onlookership” building on the social identity approach to engaged followership. In both Study 1 (cross-sectional) and Study 2 (experimental) we found that identification with a company guilty of malfeasance and identification with the monitoring agency who uncovered their scandal independently predicted opposing effects on condoning corruption, even while controlling for moral identity and demographic factors. These findings were then replicated and extended in Study 3 that made several methodological improvements upon previous studies. Results provided additional evidence of an indirect effect of the manipulation on condoning corruption through company identification. These findings provide support for an engaged onlookership model of corruption which posits that onlookers are more likely to endorse morally problematic behaviour when they believe it is performed by, and in the interests of, an organisation with which they identify.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
VolumeEarly View
Early online date18 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Corruption
  • Organisational identification
  • Engaged onlooking
  • Followership
  • Milgram

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Engaged onlooking: how organisational identification shapes public condoning of corporate corruption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this