Projects per year
Abstract
The German government presented the decision to phase out nuclear energy as a nationally accepted rebalancing of inequality in the energy sector. We expose how this radical change was delivered through a myriad of change agents, most notably through the rise of small energy companies. Critical junctures, in this case the Chernobyl disaster rather than Fukushima, offer moments in time when national policy systems are destabilized. They provide opportunities for changing policy in a perceived pro-energy justice direction if a new consensus can be forged. The paper concludes with a discussion on how energy scholars must engage more with policy analysis frameworks if long-term effective solutions are to be found to persistent energy inequalities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 317-323 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Applied Energy |
Volume | 228 |
Early online date | 27 Jun 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Energy justice
- Historical institutionalism
- Policy analysis
- Policy change
- Nuclear energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Energy justice and policy change: an historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Going Nuclear?: Going Nuclear? Exploring the multi-level politics of including neclear energy in a low carbon future
McCauley, D. (PI)
Economic & Social Research Council
31/10/11 → 31/12/13
Project: Standard