TY - JOUR
T1 - Encouraging greater empowerment for adolescents in consent procedures in social science research and policy projects
AU - Samdal, Oddrun
AU - Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle
AU - Haug, Ellen
AU - Helland, Trond
AU - Kjostarova-Unkovska, Lina
AU - Bouillon, Claire
AU - Bröer, Christian
AU - Corell, Maria
AU - Cosma, Alina
AU - Currie, Dorothy
AU - Eriksson, Charli
AU - Felder-Puig, Rosemarie
AU - Gaspar, Tania
AU - Hagquist, Curt
AU - Harbron, Janetta
AU - Jåstad, Atle
AU - Kelly, Colette
AU - Knai, Cecile
AU - Kleszczewska, Dorota
AU - Kysnes, Bjarte Birkeland
AU - Lien, Nanna
AU - Luszczynska, Aleksandra
AU - Moerman, Gerben
AU - Moreno-Maldonado, Concepcion
AU - NicGabhainn, Saoirse
AU - Pudule, Iveta
AU - Rakic, Jelena Gudelj
AU - Rito, Ana
AU - Rønnestad, Alfred Mestad
AU - Ulstein, Madeleine
AU - Rutter, Harry
AU - Klepp, Knut-Inge
N1 - The CO-CREATE project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 774210.
PY - 2023/9/27
Y1 - 2023/9/27
N2 - The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes the importance of allowing children and adolescents to influence decisions that are important to them following their age and maturity. This paper explores the principles, practices, and implications around using parental versus child/adolescent consent when participating in social science research and policy development. Experiences from two studies are presented: The Confronting Obesity: Co-creating policy with youth (CO-CREATE) and the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, a World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborative Cross-National study. Although parental consent may be an important gatekeeper for protecting children and adolescents from potentially harmful research participation, it may also be considered an obstacle to the empowerment of children and adolescents in case they want to share their views and experiences directly. This paper argues that evaluation of possible harm should be left to ethics committees and that, if no harm related to the research participation processes is identified and the project has a clear perspective on collaborating with the target group, adolescents from the age of 12 years should be granted the legal capacity to give consent to participate in the research project. Collaboration with adolescents in the development of the research project is encouraged.
AB - The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes the importance of allowing children and adolescents to influence decisions that are important to them following their age and maturity. This paper explores the principles, practices, and implications around using parental versus child/adolescent consent when participating in social science research and policy development. Experiences from two studies are presented: The Confronting Obesity: Co-creating policy with youth (CO-CREATE) and the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, a World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborative Cross-National study. Although parental consent may be an important gatekeeper for protecting children and adolescents from potentially harmful research participation, it may also be considered an obstacle to the empowerment of children and adolescents in case they want to share their views and experiences directly. This paper argues that evaluation of possible harm should be left to ethics committees and that, if no harm related to the research participation processes is identified and the project has a clear perspective on collaborating with the target group, adolescents from the age of 12 years should be granted the legal capacity to give consent to participate in the research project. Collaboration with adolescents in the development of the research project is encouraged.
KW - Adolescent consent
KW - CO-CREATE study
KW - HBSC study
KW - Parental consent
U2 - 10.1111/obr.13636
DO - 10.1111/obr.13636
M3 - Article
SN - 1467-7881
VL - 24
JO - Obesity Reviews
JF - Obesity Reviews
IS - S2
M1 - e13636
ER -