Abstract
Rogers and Pennington (1991) proposed that an early deficit in imitation, together with a cascade of developmental disorders in emotion sharing and theory of mind, could be important in understanding autism, but the research on deficits in imitation is not conclusive. Using a Do-As-I-Do procedure, the present study tested the existence of a deficit in elicited imitation in a group of individuals with autism aged from 4 to 34 years and compared their performance to that of typically developing children and to children with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. On a large battery of tasks, the majority of children and adults with autism had few problems relative to controls, although certain actions did seem more difficult, especially for the youngest children. Taking into consideration the reasonably small sample sizes, which advise cautious interpretation, implications for both theory and practice are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-163 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2004 |
Keywords
- YOUNG-CHILDREN
- IMMEDIATE
- ABILITIES
- INFANTS
- SKILLS