Abstract
When exposed to similar migration flows, countries with different institutional systems may respond with different levels of openness. We study in particular the different responses determined by different electoral systems. We find that Winner Take All countries would tend to be more open than countries with PR when all other policies are kept constant, but, crucially, if we consider the endogenous differences in redistribution levels across systems, then the openness ranking may switch.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | St Andrews |
| Publisher | University of St Andrews |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Aug 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Publisher | University of St Andrews |
| No. | 1714 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0962-4031 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2055-303X |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Proportional representation
- Median voter
- Taxation
- Occupational choice
- Migration
- Walls
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Electoral systems, taxation and immigration policies: which system builds a wall first?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver