Abstract
Cervantes's Don Quixote provided English readers and writers with a plot that made visible the madness inherent in artistic endeavour. In late seventeenth-century England, oversensitive to the pursuit of Quixotic political goals, this suspicion of artificiality was morally inflected. Thomas D'Urfey's operatic adaptation of this work in the mid-1690s, with music by Henry Purcell and other leading English stage composers, reconstituted Don Quixote as an operatic trilogy, using operatic conventions to fragment the narrative in a manner that drew attention not only to the artificiality, but also to the potential immorality, of through-written musical performance. The essay argues that the morally dubious operatic artificiality of D'Urfey's Don Quixote adaptations contributed to the subsequent reworking of this material as a satiric ballad opera by Henry Fielding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 134-148 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Forum for Modern Language Studies |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Mar 2012 |
Keywords
- Henry Purcell
- Don Quixote
- Cervantes
- Thomas D'Urfey
- opera
- narratological theory
- Henry Fielding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'D'Urfey and Don Quixote: Plot Fragmentation and the Idea of ‘Opera’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver