Abstract
A total of 445 consecutive primary total knee replacements (TKRs) were followed up prospectively at six and 18 months and three, six and nine years. Patients were divided into two groups: non-obese (body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). The obese group was subdivided into mildly obese (BMI 30 to 35 kg/m(2)) and highly obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)) in order to determine the effects of increasing obesity on outcome. The clinical data analysed included the Knee Society score, peri-operative complications and implant survival. There was no difference in the overall complication rates or implant survival between the two groups. Obesity appears to have a small but significant adverse effect on clinical outcome, with highly obese patients showing lower function scores than non-obese patients. However, significant improvements in outcome are sustained in all groups nine years after TKR. Given the substantial, sustainable relief of symptoms after TKR and the low peri-operative complication and revision rates in these two groups, we have found no reason to limit access to TKR in obese patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1351-5 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Body Mass Index
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Obesity
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Treatment Outcome
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does obesity influence clinical outcome at nine years following total knee replacement?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver