Disrupted candidacy: a longitudinal examination of the constrained healthcare‐access journeys of National Health Service workers in Scotland seeking supports for Long COVID illness

Nicholas Norman Adams*, Emma MacIver, Flora Douglas, Catriona Kennedy, Diane Skåtun, Virginia Hernandez Santiago, Nicola Torrance, Aileen Grant

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence examines how persons experiencing Long COVID (LC) struggle to secure healthcare for symptoms. However, few studies examine healthcare workers experiencing LC, nor the complex and multiple difficulties faced when seeking and receiving healthcare.
Methods: This study is based on two phases of longitudinally conducted qualitative interviews, 6 months apart, with National Health Service (NHS) workers experiencing LC, from different occupational roles at NHS locales in Scotland (first interviews, n = 50; second interviews, n = 44).
Results: Multiple factors restricted healthcare access, including worries about pressuring the NHS and concerns over LC being legitimised. When healthcare was sought, workers struggled to secure support, referrals and treatment. The following reasons were included: (1) context: the restrictive pandemic healthcare context; (2) illness climate: low GP knowledge surrounding LC and how this could be treated, trends for ascribing symptoms to other causes and reluctance to diagnose LC; (3) sense‐making of LC: healthcare availability linked to occupational role identity. To visualise and examine healthcare barriers, candidacy theory is applied, drawing inferences between healthcare context, illness climate, sense‐making and identities.
Conclusion: NHS workers' complex journeys represent Disrupted Candidacy, intersecting challenges across candidacy domains, restricting the seeking and receiving of LC healthcare. Findings provide insights into why NHS workers resisted and withdrew from healthcare‐seeking, and the barriers they faced when attempting to secure LC support. This study presents a pathway for future LC illness research to use a modified candidacy theory framework.
Patient and Public Contribution: This research focuses on amplifying and learning from lived experiences, and the voices of NHS workers in Scotland experiencing LC. Interviews represent primary data for this study; thus, participants and their healthcare journeys are centred in this research and all aspects of production, reporting and output. Explicit discussions of stakeholder group involvement are highlighted in the methods section.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70050
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume27
Issue number5
Early online date2 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Disrupted candidacy
  • Illness candidacy
  • Healthcare professionals
  • Longitudinal qualitative study
  • Healthcare access
  • Long COVID

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disrupted candidacy: a longitudinal examination of the constrained healthcare‐access journeys of National Health Service workers in Scotland seeking supports for Long COVID illness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this