Discrimination and Self-Knowledge

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper I show that a variety of Cartesian Conceptions of the mental are unworkable. In particular, I offer a much weaker conception of limited discrimination than the one advanced by Williamson (2000) and show that this weaker conception, together with some plausible background assumptions, is not only able to undermine the claim that our core mental states are luminous (roughly: if one is in such a state then one is in a position to know that one is) but (...) also the claim that introspection is infallible with respect to our core mental states (where a belief that C obtains is infallible just in case if one believes that C obtains then C obtains). The upshot is a broader and much more powerful case against the Cartesian conception of the mental than has been advanced hitherto.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntrospection and Consciousness
EditorsDeclan Smithies, Daniel Stoljar
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages329-349
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)978-0-19-974479-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Keywords

  • SELF-KNOWLEDGE
  • INFALLIBILITY
  • DISCRIMINABILITY
  • RELIABILISM
  • MARGINS FOR ERROR
  • LUMINOSITY
  • CARTESIAN CONCEPTION OF THE MENTAL
  • ANTI-LUCK EPISTEMOLOGY
  • IINTROSPECTION
  • COGNITIVE HOME
  • SAFETY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discrimination and Self-Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this