Abstract
The unconstitutional referendum of 1995 made Russian equal toBelarusian in its legal and administrative status in post-Soviet Belarus. As a result, the brief period of official monolingualism (also known as neo-Belarusianization) ended. The subsequent installation of dictatorship in Belarus took place in lockstep with the curbing of remaining public uses of Belarusian in favor of Russian. The final blow came in the wake of the 2020 mass protest and pro-democracy movement, sparked by the blatantly falsified presidential election this year. Brutal repressions followed, once again in synch with state-led actions aimed against organizations and publishers specializing in the support for and development of Belarusian language and culture. At present, the regime tends to openly see the Belarusian language as an indicator of ‘extremism', meaning democratic and liberal values.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Cetinjski filološki dani IV |
| Subtitle of host publication | zbornik radova s međunarodnoga naučnog simpozijuma održanog na Cetinju 6–8. septembra 2023 |
| Editors | Novica Vujović |
| Place of Publication | Cetinje & Lawrence, KS |
| Publisher | Fakultet za crnogorski jezik i književnost / Department of Slavic, German & Eurasian Studies, University of Kansas |
| Pages | 365-436 |
| Volume | 4 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789940400934 |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Jul 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Belarus
- Authoritarianism
- Language policy
- Russification
- Belarusian language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Discriminating the Belarusian language in Belarus after 1995'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver