Abstract
Purpose of review
People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.
Recent findings
Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.
Summary
Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.
People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.
Recent findings
Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.
Summary
Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Current Opinion in Psychiatry |
| Volume | Latest Articles |
| Early online date | 6 May 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 May 2025 |
Keywords
- Digital divide
- Homelessness
- Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
- People who use drugs
- Marginalized communities