Dialectics of mindfulness: Implications for western medicine

Sebastian Sauer*, Siobhan Lynch, Harald Walach, Niko Kohls

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mindfulness as a clinical and nonclinical intervention for a variety of symptoms has recently received a substantial amount of interest. Although the application of mindfulness appears straightforward and its effectiveness is well supported, the concept may easily be misunderstood. This misunderstanding may severely limit the benefit of mindfulness-based interventions. It is therefore necessary to understand that the characteristics of mindfulness are based on a set of seemingly paradoxical structures. This article discusses the underlying paradox by disentangling it into five dialectical positions - activity vs. passivity, wanting vs. non-wanting, changing vs. non-changing, non-judging vs. non-reacting, and active acceptance vs. passive acceptance, respectively. Finally, the practical implications for the medical professional as well as potential caveats are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10
JournalPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dialectics of mindfulness: Implications for western medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this