TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
T2 - an international case-cohort study
AU - Walsh, Simon L F
AU - Maher, Toby M
AU - Kolb, Martin
AU - Poletti, Venerino
AU - Nusser, Richard
AU - Richeldi, Luca
AU - Vancheri, Carlo
AU - Wilsher, Margaret L
AU - Antoniou, Katerina M
AU - Behr, Jüergen
AU - Bendstrup, Elisabeth
AU - Brown, Kevin
AU - Calandriello, Lucio
AU - Corte, Tamera J
AU - Cottin, Vincent
AU - Crestani, Bruno
AU - Flaherty, Kevin
AU - Glaspole, Ian
AU - Grutters, Jan
AU - Inoue, Yoshikazu
AU - Kokosi, Maria
AU - Kondoh, Yasuhiro
AU - Kouranos, Vasileios
AU - Kreuter, Michael
AU - Johannson, Kerri
AU - Judge, Eoin
AU - Ley, Brett
AU - Margaritopoulos, George
AU - Martinez, Fernando J
AU - Molina-Molina, Maria
AU - Morais, António
AU - Nunes, Hilario
AU - Raghu, Ganesh
AU - Ryerson, Christopher J
AU - Selman, Moises
AU - Spagnolo, Paolo
AU - Taniguchi, Hiroyuki
AU - Tomassetti, Sara
AU - Valeyre, Dominique
AU - Wijsenbeek, Marlies
AU - Wuyts, Wim
AU - Hansell, David
AU - Wells, Athol
AU - IPF Project Consortium
AU - Dhasmana, Devesh Janardan
N1 - Copyright ©ERS 2017.
PY - 2017/8/31
Y1 - 2017/8/31
N2 - We conducted an international study of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnosis among a large group of physicians and compared their diagnostic performance to a panel of IPF experts.A total of 1141 respiratory physicians and 34 IPF experts participated. Participants evaluated 60 cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) without interdisciplinary consultation. Diagnostic agreement was measured using the weighted kappa coefficient (κw). Prognostic discrimination between IPF and other ILDs was used to validate diagnostic accuracy for first-choice diagnoses of IPF and were compared using the C-index.A total of 404 physicians completed the study. Agreement for IPF diagnosis was higher among expert physicians (κw=0.65, IQR 0.53–0.72, p<0.0001) than academic physicians (κw=0.56, IQR 0.45–0.65, p<0.0001) or physicians with access to multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings (κw=0.54, IQR 0.45–0.64, p<0.0001). The prognostic accuracy of academic physicians with >20 years of experience (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.0–0.73, p=0.229) and non-university hospital physicians with more than 20 years of experience, attending weekly MDT meetings (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.70–0.72, p=0.052), did not differ significantly (p=0.229 and p=0.052 respectively) from the expert panel (C-index=0.74 IQR 0.72–0.75).Experienced respiratory physicians at university-based institutions diagnose IPF with similar prognostic accuracy to IPF experts. Regular MDT meeting attendance improves the prognostic accuracy of experienced non-university practitioners to levels achieved by IPF experts.
AB - We conducted an international study of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnosis among a large group of physicians and compared their diagnostic performance to a panel of IPF experts.A total of 1141 respiratory physicians and 34 IPF experts participated. Participants evaluated 60 cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) without interdisciplinary consultation. Diagnostic agreement was measured using the weighted kappa coefficient (κw). Prognostic discrimination between IPF and other ILDs was used to validate diagnostic accuracy for first-choice diagnoses of IPF and were compared using the C-index.A total of 404 physicians completed the study. Agreement for IPF diagnosis was higher among expert physicians (κw=0.65, IQR 0.53–0.72, p<0.0001) than academic physicians (κw=0.56, IQR 0.45–0.65, p<0.0001) or physicians with access to multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings (κw=0.54, IQR 0.45–0.64, p<0.0001). The prognostic accuracy of academic physicians with >20 years of experience (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.0–0.73, p=0.229) and non-university hospital physicians with more than 20 years of experience, attending weekly MDT meetings (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.70–0.72, p=0.052), did not differ significantly (p=0.229 and p=0.052 respectively) from the expert panel (C-index=0.74 IQR 0.72–0.75).Experienced respiratory physicians at university-based institutions diagnose IPF with similar prognostic accuracy to IPF experts. Regular MDT meeting attendance improves the prognostic accuracy of experienced non-university practitioners to levels achieved by IPF experts.
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.00936-2017
DO - 10.1183/13993003.00936-2017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28860269
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 50
JO - European Respiratory Journal
JF - European Respiratory Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 1700936
ER -