Abstract
Acoustic based density estimates are being increasingly used. Usually density estimation methods require one to evaluate the effective survey area of the acoustic sensors, or equivalently estimate the mean detection probability of detecting the animals or cues of interest. This is often done based on an estimated detection function, the probability of detecting an object of interest as a function of covariates, usually distance and additional covariates. If the actual survey data and the data used to estimate a detection function are not collected simultaneously, as in Marques et al. (2009), the estimated detection function might not correspond to the detection process that generated the survey data. This would lead to biaseddensity estimates.
Here we evaluate the influence of ambient noise in the detection and classification
of beaked whale clicks at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center
(AUTEC) hydrophones, to assess if the density estimates reported in Marques
et al. (2009) might have been biased. To do so we contaminated a data set with
increasing levels of ambient noise, and then estimated the detection function accounting for the noise level as an additional covariate. The results obtained suggest that for the particular results obtained at AUTEC’s deep water hydrophones the influence of ambient noise on the beaked whale’s click detection probability might have been minor, and hence unlikely to have had an impact on density estimates. However, we do not exclude the possibility that the results could be different under other scenarios.
Here we evaluate the influence of ambient noise in the detection and classification
of beaked whale clicks at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center
(AUTEC) hydrophones, to assess if the density estimates reported in Marques
et al. (2009) might have been biased. To do so we contaminated a data set with
increasing levels of ambient noise, and then estimated the detection function accounting for the noise level as an additional covariate. The results obtained suggest that for the particular results obtained at AUTEC’s deep water hydrophones the influence of ambient noise on the beaked whale’s click detection probability might have been minor, and hence unlikely to have had an impact on density estimates. However, we do not exclude the possibility that the results could be different under other scenarios.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | University of St Andrews |
Number of pages | 22 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Publication series
Name | CREEM Technical Report |
---|---|
No. | 2010-1 |