Abstract
In August 1996 the Council of Europe adopted Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection o f Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Protocol made a moratorium on executions an ‘essential precondition for accession’ for countries seeking membership of the Council, and complete repeal o f the death sentence was required to follow within three years. The Council of Europe stated clearly at the time, and its resolutions and officials have since reiterated, that applicant countries cannot be deemed ‘democratic’ if they retain the death penalty. Council of Europe President Daniel Tarschys said on 20 January 1990 that abolition of the death penalty is ‘indeed the litmus test for belonging to a civilized European family of states’ and called it one of the ‘top priorities’ of the organization. Indeed, the Council of Europe ties a state’s abolition of the death penalty to its democratic credentials and its officials have commented that it has no place in democratic society.1 In Resolution 1187 (1999) of 26. May 1999 the Parliamentary Assembly o f the Council of Europe (PACE) reaffirmed earlier resolutions that capital punishment ‘has no place in civilised, democratic societies governed by the rule of law
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The International Library of Essays on Capital Punishment, Volume 2 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Abolition and Alternatives to Capital Punishment |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 193-220 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351887519 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138379916 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Death Penalty as Democratization: Is the Council of Europe Hanging Itself?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver