TY - JOUR
T1 - Cycloalkylmethyl radicals. Part 4.1 electron spin resonance study of conformational equilibria in cyclohexenylmethyl and 4-alkylcyclohexenylmethyl radicals
AU - Walton, John C.
PY - 1986/1/1
Y1 - 1986/1/1
N2 - For cyclohex-2-enylmethyl and 4-alkylcyclohex-2-enylmethyl radicals the quasi-axial and the quasiequatorial conformers can both be observed by e.s.r. spectroscopy. Similarly, the axial and equatorial conformers of cyclohex-3-enylmethyl radical can be distinguished by e.s.r. spectroscopy. The conformational free-energy difference of the CH2’ group in the 2-position, -∆G°300., was found to be 0.17 ± 0.03 kcal mol-1 and in the 3-position -∆G°300 = 0.0 ± 0.1 kcal mol-1. The Arrhenius parameters for inversion of the half-chair conformation of cyclohex-2-enylmethyl radical were determined by line shape analysis of the exchange-broadened spectra and found to be: log(/kf/s-1) = 12.3 - (5.7 kcal mol_1)/2.3RT and log(/kb/s-1) = 12.0 - (5.5 kcal mol-1)/2.3RT. The barrier to rotation about the Cα-Cβ bond in a cyclohexenylmethyl radical is much less than the barrier in a cyclohexylmethyl radical because the former radical has only one syn-axial hydrogen on C(5) to impede the rotation whereas the latter radical has two syn-axial hydrogens on C(3) and C(5).
AB - For cyclohex-2-enylmethyl and 4-alkylcyclohex-2-enylmethyl radicals the quasi-axial and the quasiequatorial conformers can both be observed by e.s.r. spectroscopy. Similarly, the axial and equatorial conformers of cyclohex-3-enylmethyl radical can be distinguished by e.s.r. spectroscopy. The conformational free-energy difference of the CH2’ group in the 2-position, -∆G°300., was found to be 0.17 ± 0.03 kcal mol-1 and in the 3-position -∆G°300 = 0.0 ± 0.1 kcal mol-1. The Arrhenius parameters for inversion of the half-chair conformation of cyclohex-2-enylmethyl radical were determined by line shape analysis of the exchange-broadened spectra and found to be: log(/kf/s-1) = 12.3 - (5.7 kcal mol_1)/2.3RT and log(/kb/s-1) = 12.0 - (5.5 kcal mol-1)/2.3RT. The barrier to rotation about the Cα-Cβ bond in a cyclohexenylmethyl radical is much less than the barrier in a cyclohexylmethyl radical because the former radical has only one syn-axial hydrogen on C(5) to impede the rotation whereas the latter radical has two syn-axial hydrogens on C(3) and C(5).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37049070766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/P29860001641
DO - 10.1039/P29860001641
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:37049070766
SN - 1470-1820
SP - 1641
EP - 1646
JO - Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
JF - Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
IS - 10
ER -