Crow kill

Adam Reed*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between witnessing, detection and reporting in wildlife crime. It explores the ways in which these responsibilities are distributed between a range of formal and informal legal actors, and in particular emphasizes the role of the animal welfare field investigator. The specific focus is on a case of crow killing in Scotland and the prosecution of a gamekeeper observed ‘inhumanely’ despatching wild birds caught in a legally registered cage trap on a shooting estate. Of special concern is the way the ‘look’ of law plays out across the profile of the case, from the original eye witnessing of the incident to the final criteria for legal judgement. The essay is also driven by a desire to explore the relationship between law in action and ethical feeling. It offers an ethnographic perspective on the lived experience of embodying an imagined space both inside and outside the law, and on the tension or conversion between these states over time. Crow Kill is intended as one kind of anthropological contribution to the development of the study of ‘lively legalities’; in this case figured as the capacity of legal complexes to both index and generate specific instances of human-animal relations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAnimals, Biopolitics, Law
Subtitle of host publicationLively Legalities
EditorsIrus Braverman
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages99-114
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781317374046
ISBN (Print)9781138943117
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2015

Publication series

NameSpace, Materiality and the Normative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Crow kill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this