Abstract
We explore US covert forcible actions against democratic governments and their citizens and show that inter-democratic use of covert force is common and can be accommodated within the theory of democratic peace. Grounded in the Perceptual Theory of Legitimacy, we argue that democracies are constrained by public perceptions of their legitimacy from overtly aggressing against other democratic states. When democracies desire to aggress against their democratic counterparts they will do so covertly. We test the assumptions of the theory and its implication with (1) laboratory studies of the conflation of democracy with ally status, and (2) historical analyses of covert militarized actions and prisoner detention, which show that US forcible actions, when carried out against democracies and their citizens, are carried out clandestinely.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 929-956 |
Journal | Journal of Conflict Resolution |
Volume | 62 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 11 Oct 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2018 |
Keywords
- Democratic peace
- Belief structure
- Militarized interstate disputes
- Legitimacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Covert operations, wars, detainee destinations, and the psychology of democratic peace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Ryan Keith Beasley
- School of International Relations - Senior Lecturer
- Centre for Global Law and Governance
Person: Academic